See a resemblance here?
Here's my comment: yes, they are both buffoons. No, they don't look the same. But they sure do act like it...
Yahoo Answers' Caveman Lawyer said: it came to my attention that it would be possible to house everyone who needs a home in America. All the homeless, all the low income, everyone could live in decent, crime free housing in the form of condominiums.
JUST LIKE BRICKSQUAD!!!!!
In the 60s, they had the same idea and built the projects.
Bonni said...
good ideas, but you have to consider the nature of many homeless people (how do you think they wound up there? criminals, too lazy to work, made stupid decisions)
you're thinking in terms of the homeless people who don't deserve to be homeless, but in reality i would say that less than half are in this situation.
given the type of people we would be dealing with, there would be no way to expect their compliance with the rules.
you're thinking in terms of the homeless people who don't deserve to be homeless, but in reality i would say that less than half are in this situation.
given the type of people we would be dealing with, there would be no way to expect their compliance with the rules.
And there were tons of answers just like bonni's. Yes, there are tons of people that are homeless. Like Bonni, I agree that lots of people wind up homeless because of criminalisms, laziness, and stupid decisions. The game of life party, to me, shows pure genius. They plan to have strict, but not-too-hard-to-follow guidelines. Bricksquad: regardless, here's your house. Renaissance: yeah, you'll get your house, but you'll have to follow our orders when we evaluate you (spending money we don't have) and then make you go back to high school (time you could be spending fixing errors in your "evaluations," working, doing housework, or spending time with your family. It seems like they just like to waste time!
I don't think they really understand that all of these people use welfare and all of this money is spent.
Let's say that we employ people for evaluations.
We are hiring in a ratio of 25:1.
We are paying them minimum wage, $10,712 a year, full time (putting them in welfare.)
So when the number rolls around, 4,400,000, (approx..) divided by 25, that is
176, 000 welfare evaluation workers.
that is SPENDING OVER $1,885,312,000 JUST EVALUATING PEOPLE RECEIVING WELFARE EACH YEAR.
(not to mention those 176,000 people who will now be receiving welfare as well.)
BY 2015, WE WILL HAVE $30,000,000 IN DEBT.
1/3 OF THAT BEING FROM WELFARE EVALUATIONS.
DON'T BE TRICKED INTO THE ECONOMY FAILING.

well i agree on the welfare bit, but not the baffon thing! its just really cruel to insult that monkey! :<
ReplyDelete